2026 FIFA World Cup: Three reasons the Super Eagles might have thrived despite failing to qualify

Nigeria’s absence from the 2026 FIFA World Cup remains one of the tournament’s biggest talking points, especially following the mixed performances of Africa’s representatives in the United States, Canada and Mexico, Afrik Foot reports.

Only Morocco and Egypt managed to progress to the Round of 16 despite Africa having a record ten representatives at the tournament.

Yet, former Flying Eagles assistant coach Simon Kalika believes the Super Eagles could have performed even better had they secured qualification.

Simon Kalika: Super Eagles would have impressed at the World Cup

Speaking to Complete Sports, Kalika insisted that Nigeria possessed enough quality to surpass every African nation at the tournament.

“Nigeria is exceptionally blessed with talent. You can see Nigerian players in all the major leagues across Europe and the rest of the world,” the Dutch coach said.

“I think the way they are playing now, yes, they would have done better at the World Cup.

“It’s painful that the Super Eagles didn’t qualify for the World Cup 2026. The world would have seen one of the most talented teams at the tournament.”

While such claims may initially appear emotional, there are several reasons why Kalika’s assessment may not be entirely out of place.

Three reasons the Super Eagles might have thrived and the 2026 World Cup

1. Nigeria possess one of Africa’s best squads

Few African nations can rival Nigeria’s current depth in terms of players competing at elite European clubs.

Victor Osimhen remains one of world football’s most feared strikers, while Ademola Lookman has developed into one of Europe’s finest attacking players. Samuel Chukwueze, Moses Simon, Alex Iwobi, Wilfred Ndidi and Calvin Bassey all continue to perform at high levels across Europe’s top leagues, albeit at different levels of consistency.

Beyond the established stars, emerging names such as Tolu Arokodare, Rafiu Durosinmi, Christantus Uche and Akor Adams have further strengthened the squad’s options.

Unlike several African teams that relied heavily on a handful of standout performers, Nigeria arguably possess quality in almost every department, allowing them to adapt tactically to different opponents.

At major tournaments, squad depth often proves decisive, particularly when injuries and suspensions begin to take their toll.

2. Eric Chelle appears to have rediscovered Nigeria’s identity

Although Nigeria ultimately failed to reach the World Cup, performances under Eric Chelle have shown encouraging signs.

The Malian tactician has gradually restored intensity, organisation and attacking fluidity to the team. The Super Eagles have looked more cohesive in recent outings, combining their traditional attacking flair with improved defensive structure.

The team’s pressing patterns and quicker transitions have made them significantly more difficult to play against.

Several African sides at the World Cup struggled with consistency and tactical balance. Nigeria’s blend of physicality, technical quality and pace could have made them dangerous opponents, particularly in knockout football where fine margins often decide games.

A team featuring Osimhen, Lookman and Simon in transition would have caused problems for many of the tournament’s participants.

3. Tournament football often suits Nigeria’s mentality

Historically, Nigeria have shown an ability to rise on the biggest stages. The Super Eagles reached the Round of 16 in 1994, 1998 and 2014 World Cups, while they have consistently produced memorable performances against elite opposition at major tournaments.

Even during periods of instability, Nigeria have often found another level when representing the continent on the global stage.

The current generation also possesses considerable experience in high-pressure matches. Players such as Osimhen, Lookman, Iwobi, Ndidi and Bassey have played in title-deciding games at their respective clubs.

By comparison, some of Africa’s representatives at the World Cup lacked experience at this level, which was evident in crucial moments.

Cape Verde’s remarkable campaign and DR Congo’s competitiveness demonstrated that African football is rapidly improving. Given Nigeria’s superior depth and individual quality, it is not unreasonable to believe the Super Eagles could have matched or even exceeded those heights.

A painful lesson for Nigerian football

Ultimately, the biggest frustration is that Nigeria will never know how far this talented generation could have gone.

The Super Eagles arguably possess one of the strongest squads on the continent, yet qualification failures continue to prevent them from showcasing their abilities on football’s biggest stage.

Kalika’s comments may reopen old wounds, but they also serve as a reminder of the potential still within Nigerian football.

With the next Africa Cup of Nations and the 2030 World Cup cycle approaching, the challenge for the Nigeria Football Federation will be ensuring that this golden generation does not continue to miss opportunities to compete where they arguably belong.